Knocking out those senseless residency
rules
by rick olivares
Essentially, the UAAP’s Two-Year Residency Rule –
even before it enters its second year -- is terminated.
The second step in taming the wild west that is
Philippine scholastic sports took a more serious turn when Senators Pia
Cayetano and Cynthia Villar presided over a public hearing at the Senate of the
Philippines in Pasay City last Wednesday, April 10, regarding two bills that
will protect student-athletes.
With the UAAP seemingly taking its time resolving the
controversial residency rules, Sen. Cayetano wasn’t willing to wait another year
while even more student-athletes in limbo or stuck in a situation where they have no say.
Blunt and not mincing her words, Senator Pia Cayetano
called the rule "a human rights violation" and said that she will have Senate
Bill 2166: An Act Providing For The Magna Carta Of Student-Athletes passed into
law this June whether the UAAP gets its act together or not. “Kick out that
rule because it is a human rights violation and before I pass the rule into law
this June,” admonished Cayetano who expressed disappointment over the league's inaction.
UAAP President Dr. Ester Albano-Garcia of the
University of the East revealed that the league is doing its part by engaging
multinational advisory firm KPMG to draft reforms for the league. However,
since the UAAP’s committee on amendments had already met recently, any new
suggestions by the firm will not be acted upon by the UAAP until the next school year.
Senators Cayetano and Cynthia Villar found the move
unacceptable and motioned for a speedy resolution to the mess that has engulfed even leagues in the provinces.
An incredulous Villar passionately spoke about the
enriching experience of moving from one school to another that broadens a
student’s horizons. “The residency rules deny them that right,” she pointed
out.
She left everyone in the assembly with a sobering
thought, “It is unfortunate that we have to make legislation. Don’t let
Congress discipline you.”
The two Senate Bills waiting to be passed into law
are SBN 2166: An Act Providing For The Magna Carta Of Student-Athletes (authored
by Sen. Cayetano) and SBN 1252: An Act Regulating Certain Conduct By Sports
Agents Relating To The Signing Of Contracts With Student-Athletes (authored by
Sen. Defensor-Santiago). Due to the lack of time, only certain provisions of
the Magna Carta of Student-Athletes was tackled.
These two Senate Bills first stemmed from the
controversy arising from the residency rules slapped by the UAAP on
student-athletes who moved from one UAAP high school to another UAAP college.
The first step was the public hearing held last April 1, 2013 when Sen. Cayetano
invited UAAP officials to shed light on the issues surrounding the two-year residency rule. However, conspicuously absent in
the discussion were four schools that voted for the rule: FEU, La Salle, UST,
and UE. Adamson also voted for the passing of the rule but was present at the
hearing as they were the host school.
During Thursday’s public hearing, representatives
from the UAAP, NAASCU, WNCAA, PASUC, and SCUAA were present. Conspicuously
absent despite receiving invites were any representatives from the NCAA and
NCRAA. Also represented in the public hearing were the Philippine Sports
Commission, the Commission on Higher Education, and the National Youth
Commission.
Dr. Albano-Garcia spoke in defense of the rule saying
that their 10-peat volleyball champions in the juniors have been repeatedly
“poached” – to use her word – by one school. She even pointed out that four of
their top players all went that one school – “which is statistically impossible
unless there is something behind the move.”
"The problem with that argument," debunked Cayetano,
“is what about the other players who are not recruited? Are they absorbed by
the seniors team?”
The UE President could not answer.
In another vexing statement, De. Albano-Garcia said that the different university presidents of the UAAP are not aware of what the UAAP Board Members -- their representatives -- come up with. Well, it's good they do not micromanage but aren't they appalled at all the controversy year in and out? Aren't they shocked that the board members come up with all these inane rules? And they have the PhDs and the matter isn't even rocket science.
In another vexing statement, De. Albano-Garcia said that the different university presidents of the UAAP are not aware of what the UAAP Board Members -- their representatives -- come up with. Well, it's good they do not micromanage but aren't they appalled at all the controversy year in and out? Aren't they shocked that the board members come up with all these inane rules? And they have the PhDs and the matter isn't even rocket science.
When personally asked by the Senator to further shed
light on the plight of the student-athletes, I mentioned six current high
school players – who I obviously could not name for they went to me for help but requested anonymity out of fear of reprisals by their
schools. These six were not recruited by their seniors teams. The problem is, not only are they
are not allowed to try out for another school
team but they are not being released. This is an act of hoarding as in local sports parlance, "hindi ka papaiyakin kapag nakalaban mo."
Some are being tabbed for Team B but no one wants to be on Team B. Hence, trying their luck elsewhere. In the absence of a release what can they do? It should be known that they too are also after the scholarships because they do not come from wealthy families. At the very end, they could wind up with nothing.
Some are being tabbed for Team B but no one wants to be on Team B. Hence, trying their luck elsewhere. In the absence of a release what can they do? It should be known that they too are also after the scholarships because they do not come from wealthy families. At the very end, they could wind up with nothing.
Once more the league’s logic confounded everyone. The
root of the problem – the lawlessness when it comes to recruiting – is hurting
student-athletes and the league. Instead of addressing its problems, the league comes up
with even more rules that compound the issue.
In the interest of haste and the welfare of the student-athletes, Cayetano will present the bill for approval on May 5.
Collegiate associations have been invited to attend the workshop that will
fine-tune the provisions of the bill after Holy Week.
During my turn on the floor, I respectfully asked if
I could make a suggestion/provision to the bill. And this is what I
recommended:
Section 7
Obligations of Schools
That all
student-athletes be informed of any financial obligations stemming from their
recruitment and scholarship if any at all.
The reason why I brought this up is some schools –
UAAP and NCAA – suddenly ask their student-athletes to pay for miscellaneous
fees, training fees etc. when they leave or are removed. In one school, some
athletes saw their scholarship revoked when they did not win a medal. When they
tried to get their diploma, they were asked to pay for fees amounting to over
P100,000! They could not afford to pay for it so they never got their diploma
or their transcript of records making it difficult to apply for work. Imagine
the inhumanity of that. Is that practiced for all the school’s athletes? Not at
all.
It turns out that the inanity regarding rules isn’t
confined to the UAAP and the NCAA. It also festers in CESAFI and even the
SCUAA. They too have adopted residency rules and are plagued by "commercialization". Many of those in attendance agreed that collegiate sports is now highly commercialized and any amateur tag is just for show. It is semi-pro if not pro already.
Get this, in SCUAA, they disallow national players
from competing in league play because they are deemed to be “a cut above the
rest.” What kind of bunk is that?
National competitions or even international ones do
not happen all the time so what will do when they aren’t competing? Just
continue to train? Ano sila, Smart Gilas?
With regards to recruiting, the UAAP schools are
upset at other member schools for recruiting their players. BUT HOW MANY ARE ACTUALLY HOMEGROWN PLAYERS WHO CAME
UP FROM THEIR GRADE SCHOOL RANKS? Did they recruit anyone from their provincial
schools? Furthermore, didn’t they promise something that their provincial
schools could not offer? WHAT HYPOCRITES!
It is time to deal this stupid rule and all other
stupid rules a knockout punch. And I am glad Senators Cayetano and Villar are pushing for this.
Ang galing mo talaga! "Ano sila Smart Gilas?!' Naku e yun ay kung matatawag mo nga na smart. ;-)
ReplyDeleteBottomline: Scrap residency rule first for hs to college recruits (within uaap). It's absurd. Apply only the residency rule, 2 years, I don't care, to players transferring colleges within the league. Then max age still applies to limit eligibility.
ReplyDeleteThen, address the recruitment practice, yes, it should be transparent and with limits (caps).