Goodbye to the sledgehammer and the
crowbar.
by rick olivares pic by joseph nocos
This is like a best-of-five
series between the Ateneo Blue Eagles and the Far Eastern University Tamaraws
in the UAAP Final Four dating back to Season 78 with the former taking it, 3-1.
The core of this team met in
Season 78 with Mac Belo’s tip sending FEU to the finals (which they won over
UST).
They met again the next season
with FEU upending Ateneo in Game One of the Final Four. In Game Two, Isaac Go
scored on a putback to lift the Blue Eagles to a 69-68 win in overtime that
sent Ateneo to the finals.
In Season 80, Isaac Go once more
played the hero with his triple to send Game Two of their semis series with FEU
into overtime where he tag-teamed with Matt Nieto for an 88-84 win to enter the
finals.
So what does the sledgehammer and
the crowbar have to do with all of this.
It was after Game Two of the
Season 79 Final Four where Tab Baldwin quipped, “You cannot separate these two
teams with a sledgehammer and a crowbar.”
And following the 80-61
demolition of FEU in Game One of the Season 81 Final Four where the Blue Eagles
led by as much as 31 points, I guess we can all throw out that sledgehammer and
crowbar.
There were a few players on FEU’s
2010 squad present – RR Garcia, Terrence Romeo, Achie Iñigo, Roger Pogoy, and Gryann
Mendoza – at the Smart Araneta Coliseum for the Final Four match between the
Ateneo Blue Eagles and the Tamaraws. That was Season 73 in case you want to put
it in UAAP terms.
Perhaps for the former Tams, it
was déjà vu all over again.
In 2010, they defeated Ateneo in
the first and last games of the elimination round. They were making all sorts
of noises about unseating the Blue Eagles when they met in the finals.
Except Game One, didn’t go quite
as planned. The Tams were crushed in Game One, 72-49, with Emman Monfort
putting the clamps on the newly-minted league MVP, RR Garcia. In Game Two, Ryan
Buenafe’s killer three lifted the Blue Eagles to a pulsating 65-62 win for the
three-peat.
And now, the blue and white juggernaut
is back in the finals and is two wins away from annexing the crown.
Just as they did during Game One
of the 2010 title game, Ateneo played flat out great defense. The Tams hardly
had daylight. The glimmer of hope came early after Ken Tuffin and Arvin
Tolentino hit triples from either side of the corner pocket to slice Ateneo’s
lead, 10-6. But that was it.
Only four players did well
shooting-wise. Barkley Eboña (3/4), LJ Gonzales (3/3), Alec Stockton (2/3), and
Arvin Tolentino (2/4). But even that is misleading. Tolentino was shut down and
battled foul trouble. Furthermore, he doesn’t take four shots a game. He takes
much more than that so four field goal attempts isn’t what FEU had in mind.
Stockton was thrown out for a disqualifying foul. As for Eboña, more on him
later.
FEU was held to an average of 12
points for the first three quarters. They only did well in the fourth when
Ateneo emptied its bench.
Ateneo repeatedly attacked that
basket with Thirdy Ravena setting the tone with back-to-back dunks.
The ball movement was superb and the
offense – at least for the first 33 minutes – was devastating. And for the most
part, Ateneo didn’t step off the gas pedal (well, until the bench didn’t
perform well late in the game). Tone and pace of the game aside, I was puzzled
by some of FEU’s moves.
I was surprised that Eboña played
only 16 minutes. He gave Ateneo fits early in the game. Why didn’t he play
alongside with Orizu who was mostly ineffective (well, he just got back from an
injury and isn’t 100%)? Why was Orizu sent to the bench when Angelo Kouame went
to the bench? I thought that he should have stayed in the game because they
sorely needed to reduce that deficit.
I know Jasper Parker struggled
but in a game like this, I would unleash him and all their veterans. But of
course, that is just me.
Other than the great defense, I
have some quibbles.
I think the bench wavered. When
the starters were off the court, FEU pressed (they don’t press much when Matt
Nieto is on the court). I know they should be ready whatever the circumstance
(the rotation usually gets shorter come the bigger games) and it was a bit
surprising to see them not rise to the challenge.
Having said that, maybe Tab
Baldwin can keep some of the starters on the court with the bench players --
and he did this at some point when he brought back Thirdy Ravena into the game
to help the bench out. That would help them out. I do not mean to tell the
coach how to do his job, after all, he knows much more. But just to illustrate,
previously, either Greg Slaughter or Kiefer Ravena were on either on the court
together or would alternate to backstop the team.
And what is it with all those
double fouls. How can there be so many double fouls? Did both fouls occur at
the same time? I don’t get that at all.
Nevertheless, Ateneo is back in
the finals while FEU will have to rebuild as they are losing Tolentino, Orizu,
Richard Escoto, RJ Ramirez, and Axel Iñigo. I think Prince has a year to go but
I am not sure if he will play this out. It was also sad to see that Tolentino
had to be on the losing side and I appreciate his thank you to the Ateneo
crowd. Like his teammates, I wish them well in the next stage of their lives.
Next up, is winning the title
against either Adamson on UP. Can we use that sledgehammer on either of them?
We’re going to find out.
who were the referees? are they the same referees in the DLSU vs Adamson last year ? From the same ref organization? I think refs should be vetted to see possible connections to gambling syndicates. some calls are suspicious... the refs must be investigated... successive double fouls and on a targeted individual.. either mistake due to inexperience or due outright intention to control the outcome of the game... i bought my ticket in Araneta about 11 am.. the ticket person said sold out except for upper box... yet i saw some unsold tickets in lower box .. how come? scalpels at work again? can you pls put on your investigative reporter hat to look into these 2 items... dubious ref calls and sold out seats?
ReplyDeleteNice write-up, Rick.
ReplyDeletehahahah why am I not surprise?
ReplyDeleteIMO, it will be ADU; it is for them to lose it.
The 'physicality' of FEU was meant to take Thirdy out of his game. He and Kouame can expect the same whoever they face on the Finals. It is possible it could be a foul that really provokes.
ReplyDelete