 |
| MLB's new baseball replay center in New York. Photo by Richard Drew/Associated Press) |
This appears in the Monday, April 7, 2014 edition of the Business Mirror.
The imperfections of trying
to make it perfect
The first week of the new baseball season finds the new rules under
intense scrutiny
by rick olivares
In the space of a week, a pair of rule changes and their
applications have been a part of heated discussions of the very young baseball
season.
Last Monday, April 1, San Francisco Giants manager Bruce Bochy felt
the after effects of a lost challenge. During the fourth inning of a match
against the Arizona Diamondbacks, Giants’ pitcher Matt Cain attempted to pick
of AJ Pollock who had drifted off the first base bag. The umpire called Pollock
safe and Bochy challenged the call.
Major League Baseball’s new instant replay rules allow two manager
challenges per team and per game. If the manager wins the first challenge, he
will be granted a second challenge. If the first challenge takes places before
the first six innings, then the manager cannot call for a review until the
seventh inning. Only questionable home runs are exempt from the challenges.
The safe call on Pollock was upheld and a few batters later, with
the Diamondbacks’ center fielder still on the field, Cain threw an outside
pitch that catcher Buster Posey could not corral. Pollock scooted home with
Cain running over to cover home plate. Posey made the throw to the pitcher who
tagged Pollock but the Arizona player was called safe.
Pollock was definitely out but because Bochy had run out of
challenges, the call stood. And that missed call and botched Bochy challenge
told on the match that saw Arizona slip by 5-4.
Two days later at the Rodgers Centre in Toronto, New York Yankees
manager Joe Girardi challenged a call where Ichiro Suzuki was called out on an
infield hit. That would have been an inning-ending play but instead Girardi won
the challenge and Suzuki went on to score to help New York win its first game
of the season.
But the Yankees were snakebit when one of the new rules didn’t seem
to work out as planned.
Against the Blue Jays last April 5, controversy arose about the new
home plate collisions rule. Toronto shut out New York, 4-0, and denied the
Yankees a run when the Blue Jays John Thole tagged out Francisco Cervelli at
home plate.
New rules stipulate that
catchers cannot block a runner’s path unless they have clear possession of the
ball. Replays showed Thole straddling the plate while awaiting the throw, then
dropped his right knee to block Cervelli immediately after receiving the ball.
The Associated Press quoted
Girardi as saying, "The way it was explained to us is if you're straddling
the base in front, toward third base, that is considered to be blocking home
plate. To me, it's clear that he's doing that."
I can understand the new changes in the game: instant replay is
meant to correct human error based on judgment calls while the collision rule
is meant to prevent injuries. Fans have been worried that all the stoppage will
only make what is a long game even longer. On opening day of the new season,
each instant replay challenge took an average of 93 seconds for a decision to
be made. So in essence, it’s not much.
But there are kinks in the system.
Last April 4, the Atlanta Braves turned party poopers when they
spoiled the Washington Nationals’ home opener with the help of an overturned
home run for a 2-1 win. Yet the call didn’t seem the correct one at all.
After what looked like an inside-the-park home run by the Nats’ Ian
Desmond – the ball was nestled on the padding of the left field wall – Atlanta
challenged the non-call and Desmond’s hit was declared a ground rule double so
he had to trot back to second base.
Washington manager Matt Williams did not agree with the decision to
overturn the home run. Williams pointed out that if Braves left fielder BJ
Upton was able to field the ball upon prodding from teammate Andrelton Simmons
who waved at his teammate to throw home then it was a live ball. Furthermore,
there was no call made by any of the umpires so how can one overturn a
non-call?
Talk about a double whammy. Clearly, MLB will have to review this and
isn’t that ironic?
Quite honestly, for all the further controversy the new rule
changes have wrought, I applaud MLB for implementing them. Obviously there is
still a lot to correct in a baseball game. Erroneous calls on balls and strikes
are some of the most debatable and agonizing. The changes, many will argue are
still woefully incomplete.
Instead of Billy Martinesque or Earl Weaver-esque umpire challenges
where they not only kicked dirt at the official but also looked like they were
going to bust a blood vessel we now get video challenges.
So now technology has gotten its hands on the last sacred game on
earth that has mostly gotten by on tradition.
However, in defense of the changes and amendments, if MLB gets it
right then they can add a few more over the next few years. Early on, there are
two new rules and it has stirred a hornet’s nest of controversy (and I haven’t
even pointed out all the challenges and calls of the first week).
There will always still be controversy as umpires are called upon
to make split second decisions and God knows how many games are affected by
these calls. But at least they are making a serious effort to make the correct
calls.
