Sunday, February 13, 2011

Bleachers' Brew #247 The Home Game



This appears in the Monday, February 14, 2011 edition of the Business Mirror.





The Home Game
by rick olivares

The home game – Philippines versus Mongolia -- was without a doubt a resounding success. The Azkals won. The atmosphere was great. The fans packed the stadium in much larger numbers than the Tiger Cup in 2006 (also in Panaad) and in AFC Challenge Cup Qualifiers 2008 (in Iloilo). The quantum difference now is how the national team and football has detonated in local cyberspace and throughout the country.

If people are grading new coach Hans Michael Weiss, it is only fair that we grade everything else.

Tickets. I thought that the Philippine Football Federation should have either 1) assigned it to an outside party; or 2) have someone from their office handle it full time rather than attend to other federation duties on the side. It doesn’t take rocket science to figure out how massive an undertaking ticket selling entails. Based on complaints from fans who I spoke to (and witnessed in their exasperation and anger) here in Manila and Bacolod, they said that selling of tickets and dissemination of information regarding their availability was wanting. More than answering via email which can be tedious, maybe those handling ticket sales should have come out with official notices on a website or in the newspapers. There was information that tickets were released to the local football associations and there was news that it was available at Panaad. There should have been a help center for all of these concerns.

Many people were late to arrive in Panaad because their flights were delayed then they had to weather the traffic going to the stadium. Imagine them being told they could no longer enter to watch because the venue was packed! How the heck did that happen? Was there a surplus of tickets produced? I can understand not releasing the tickets early because of concerns regarding counterfeiting but the lack of information is not an excuse.

A refund will not suffice. If you look over to the problems of the NFL with regards to not being able to give seats to those who bought tickets to Superbowl XLV, they offered free tickets, airline and hotel accommodations to the disenfranchised for next year’s big show. Yet they still got sued. But that’s America where slapping lawsuits on one another is a national pastime.

The PFF must address this and ensure that this doesn’t happen again.

Security. During the penultimate practice before game day, there were only three security personnel on hand to deal with hundreds of fans who ran down from the stands for picture ops and autographs. There were none available when they ducked out towards their bus afterwards.

And during the game, I was surprised to see a soldier wave off Phil Younghusband after he ran to the track after he scored the second goal. Whoever briefed the security obviously does not watch football. Let the goal scorer celebrate. It’s up to the security people to keep people in the stands not ward off someone who just blasted in a fabulous goal.

That reminded me years ago of an international match held in Barotac Nuveo when a dog entered the pitch during a game (it was a women’s match) and an overzealous cop ran after it with an M-16. Jeez.

However, the lack of briefing aside, I would like to commend the local cops for being very polite and very helpful during the match. There were more than a few testy moments as they thoroughly inspected the bags of patrons even if it earned the ire of many who couldn’t wait to get it. An inconvenience it might be but I’d rather they err on the side of caution than complacency.

Stadium. The pitch in Panaad is one of our better ones (I like the pitch at Cuenca Field and UMAK) but the stadium is not. We had time to prep for this match, why wasn’t the venue given a paintjob? It looked old and the lights that hung from the top were rusting. It’s amazing what a fresh coat of paint can do. They should have gotten one of those paint companies as a sponsor.

The comfort rooms gave only momentary comfort (when one was able to relieve themselves). Other than that – it assaulted everyone’s olfactory sense. When I informed stadium personnel about the stink (and this was five hours before kick off) that wafted around the press conference room (the CR was a few feet away), they simply sprayed Lysol that all but kept the stink out for 10 minutes.

And the local organizers should have worked out a public transportation scheme to ferry people to and fro the stadium. Not every one had a car. If they had one in place the traffic would have been more manageable. Many left late in the evening and had to hoof it all the way to the far exit to the main road (a 25-minute walk from the stadium). It’s supposed to be safe, right? Am not sure. When our media group left at 11pm, we saw some youths chasing one another with broken bottles and lead pipes.

The availability of food and merchandise stalls as well as the tailgate parties held outside the venue greatly added to the party atmosphere. The fun began outside and continued during the match all the way up to the fireworks display (that went on for more than 10 minutes) that was a perfect ending to the night. Good idea on the fireworks for whoever thought of that.

Television coverage. I didn’t see the match on television as I was in the stadium but the one thing I will say is, “what were those A-boards doing so close to the pitch? They should be several meters back. Their placement at the end of the pitch and obviously for their corporate sponsors is ironically a danger to the players and a detriment to the game.

Press relations. No press kit. No press statement. Not enough chairs and tables or even a proper work area in the stadium. No wifi (despite Smart saying the whole stadium was connected so we all improvised by using our Globe broadband). No microphones. No water cooler or coffee. This is no way to deal with the media.

Fans. Obviously we have not had much of success in our footballing history and the lack of proper fight songs or cheers showed. But I have to give props to the fans and for those who worked the crowd in chants and cheers of “Ole” and “Who let the dogs out”. Next time the PFF should identify these booster groups who are willing to sing loud and proud and place them in one section where their efforts will lead everyone else in the get the stadium rocking. And I have to mention good friend Ebong Joson for showing guts in running across the grandstand and the track as he waved the Philippine flag.

Notwithstanding the problems of that home game here and there, it was a good start in this new era for Philippine football. The PFF leadership under Mariano V. Araneta has had their hands full from the moment of the change in leadership. They have not had any breather from all the work. But it’s nice to know that their hearts are in the right place and that they are dead set on turning things around for Philippine football.

Forza.

-------------------

You know what I forgot? The whistles. Damn those who brought them and blew them. They should be shot.

15 comments:

  1. I agree 100% with your observations, especially as regards ticketing and venue issues. I'm interested to know how you would grade the media coverage, though.

    I watched the game live and I've seen the two replays, so far. And I have to agree with the sentiments of many that maybe there were more capable commentators around to cover the game. I won't nitpick here and point out any specific complaint, but suffice to say that for most of the night Mr. Guerrero and Mr. Atayde's performance was shaky and tentative, at best.

    If they're already the best we have when we talk about football, then I suppose we have to start giving our media a bit of football 101, as well.

    Other than that, it was still an experience I'm glad I was a small part of.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ...worth of an experience...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think Mr. Guerrero and Mr. Atayde are one of the best commentators we have when it comes to sports other than football. Not saying they were bad, but maybe because of lack of experience when covering football games that they inserted basketball terms in a football game(they called a "throw in" a "free throw"). Again that wasn't a bad thing because majority of the viewing public might not know of football terms that much, so it's a work in progress. I wonder if Mr. Olivares can take a shot at being a sport commentator? :)

    Also the slow mo's were too long.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with uberjam re commentators. Was in Panaad too and watched the replay yesterday. If I close my eyes I would think it was basketball. They talked too much- mashadong maraming side stories. Put it simply...takot sila sa dead air. But in football, it's really usually quiete until the intensity builds up. Maybe they should watch more football matches on StarSports. Take a cue from the commentators there. hehe

    About the coverage- I think there was too much 'close up' shots- mas maganda pag full or half field shots. This way nakikita yung dynamics ng team instead of a specific player per frame.

    Hopefully next time ABS-CBN picks commentators who are experts in football- this way viewers learn while watching.

    I also hope Rizal Stadium will be ready soon so we can hold games in Manila too. :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. but you missed out the fireworks...i think they over did it. how much do you think it cost them to continuously fire all those fireworks???? i think around P500k....it went on for 15 min++ non-stop...it took diverted the attention from the teama nd the players...
    they could have just limited it...to say 5 min or so...
    this wasnt a fireworks display contest....
    and the worst thing is, it was charged again to the people's money..a govt official sponsored it...of course not from his own pocket...

    ReplyDelete
  6. in fairness to the commentators, i think ABS wants that kind of commentary. two years ago i did the uaap football finals coverage and we tried to talk like what is done in european matches (minus the accent) but the director chided us. they wanted the eat bulaga type with us going nuts with every scoring chance. that's what the filipinos want daw. maybe they are right. maybe they are wrong. my prob with the television carrier is a tendency to make everything into something showbiz. they know jack about football and that puts me off. sikat lang kasi kaya sumabak na rin sila.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Slow mo replays were too long. They had so many tight shots that we couldn't see what was going on throughout the pitch. The panning was very amateurish. The PBA coverage is even better. I'm just wondering why the director and camera men didn't study the coverage of the 2010 World Cup which ABS-CBN had the rights to and aired on Balls. They also could've learned from the excellent coverage of the English Premier League which they air on Star Sports daily. Sayang!

    ReplyDelete
  8. About the fireworks, yeah, it did come from an official but I don't think he used the people's money. He comes from a wealthy family and he has money to spend in his own right (and I'm not defending the guy because I'm a supporter, friend, relative, or whatever. Heck, I haven't even personally met the guy). But the people really enjoyed the display - it kinda added to the celebrating atmosphere.
    And the commentators? Ugh. I think ABS could've done better. James YH even tweeted saying that "the guy on the right doesn't even know who the players are?!" Don't remember who was on the right though. But really, isn't there anyone who could do better?
    I wouldn't say anything else about the stadium and the transpo because everything was already said above.
    And for the fans, ahaha, you just had to be there. The vibe was just unexplainable. It was great. The atmosphere was electrifying. And it just wasn't at that time. Even during the practices, fans would be wherever they are to show their support (and some probably wanted other things too).
    But one thing I could commend on the whole Azkals experience, as someone who lives in Bacolod, their presence broke the lines between the upper, lower, and middle class. It brought everyone together which was great.
    Overall, it was an experience that we should all be proud to have witnessed. More power to them and to the future of football in our country.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree on the TV coverage, i.e. the A-boards. More so, the match clock was not kept in sight! As if the said network didn't show the World Cup, for them to know the standards. On the commentators. I like more the more subdued-speaking commentator than the one who seemed just too excited and kept blabbing but not knowledgeable about football.

    ReplyDelete
  10. displaying a match clock will only confuse the uninitiated. those who are new to the sport will expect the ref to blow the whistle or worse make a countdown at the end of the 90th minute.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Displaying a match clock will NOT confuse the uninitiated. How can we educate the newbies of football if we do not put a clock?

    One of the comments of those who watched the game live was, what the hell was the time? How many minutes left?

    Obviously, aside from the pitch and the seats, we should also invest in a proper scoreboard with match clock. At the very least, for Panaad to be considered a proper football venue for an international match.

    IMHO

    ReplyDelete
  12. On the commentators aspect, I can suggest why not tap someone who knows the rules of the game and especially the laws of the game. For example a retired referee, an experienced coach, or anyone who is very much familiar with the sport. Since most of the Filipinos are not yet aware of the sport and considering the very good and quick response to it's popularity, Every call of the referee must be explained by an expert. For example the 2nd yellow card issued to a number 9 player from Mongolia and how he has been thrown-out. It was not a "delaying the game" but it is a "failure to comply required distance" and he was "sent-off" for "second cautionable offense (another yellow card)" and of course he will be suspended for the second leg. I should say every moves or actions must be interpreted in a "football terminologies".

    ReplyDelete
  13. lighting i think is still insufficient in panaad, don't know how it is there but on tv the players' shadows are quite apparent.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Was at Panaad and did watch one of the replays.

    Tickets - Yes. I agree that the PFF should have handled this better. They could have possibly outsourced this. Or, maybe someone would volunteer their time to assist on this. If time had allowed me, I would gladly have chipped in.

    Security. - I have heard of the stories of the players being mobbed. It sure felt like the U-Mak practices were very very tame in comparison. PFF should also look into indoor football facilities (if there are any).

    Stadium. - Wholeheartedly agreeing on the transpo. Was lucky enough to find a cab to and fro the stadium. Cost was reasonable since there were 3-4 of us. Love the scene and tailgate. Sure felt like the NFL in the States. The atmosphere was excellent. Facilities-wise, sure needs work, but I do hope the Negrenses can handle this for the future.

    Television coverage. - Could have been better, but definitely better than the early coverage we had of the Suzuki Cup. There were points in the coverage where they were smart to educate the viewers on the little nuances of the game. I think ABS-CBN should be able to figure out what do they really want to do. They should remember who their target audience is and adjust accordingly, with how they do their coverage.

    Press relations. - Wi-fi was present. Tweets were flowing during the game(SMART-powered the access in the grandstand). Again, hopefully, they'll do better next time.

    Fans - Hey, good job by the boosters and fans who egged on the crowds. Not perfect, but there is definitely something we can work with.

    All-in-all, not bad for Mr. Araneta and his motley crew. The groundwork has been laid on and off the pitch. Time for everyone to capitalize and grow.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Security - My rating would be 3/10...Apparently me and my buddies were "hit and run" by some "tambay" thieves when we were on our way to the Hi-Way...fortunately they only got away with my friend's cap... Moreover, we even overheard some ladies complaining about missing cellphones and wallets... I totally agree that PFF MUST find a way to provide safe and comfortable transpo to-and-fro to the Stadium and Hi-way..

    Overall: With that negative experience, I would give a score of 6/10...

    Thus I dare to say:
    "Sa mga taga-Mansilingan dira, madakpan ko lang to kung sino nag-arbor sang kalo panitan ko gid kamu buhi!!!! Dumduman ko gid itsura nyo!!!"

    ReplyDelete